As I have mentioned in passing, I have been using Blog Catalog more and more, and primarily to meet and socialize with the kinds of thoughtful, logical people who can make an online argument fun, for those of us who like that sort of thing. I lead two discussion groups over there, Skilled Political Debate (moderated) and Ron Paul For President.

Don’t faint, Mom. I am not supporting or working for Ron Paul, and largely function as a devil’s advocate to respectfully question supporters claims and lead discussion threads so that they become conversations worth remembering. I am, however, working for blog catalog as an intern. I think the site owner and I agreed on the job title Ambassador, but he is a brilliant mile a minute kind of guy who occasionally pops in to lavish praise or ask a few questions or share news but mostly says, I trust you, do what you think best.

So it was that Friday afternoon found me struggling to lead a discussion of Hillary’s Presidential campaign. It was a slow day on the boards and we only had a handful of our most skilled debaters on hand and I painstakingly led the discussion to the point of getting someone to state what to me is SO obvious. That the only way the Democrats could possibly lose in 2008 is to nominate Hillary Clinton. Hillary is an INCREDIBLY polarizing figure. (shouting intentional). As many of us on the left dislike her as our counterparts on the right. Nominating Hillary would guarantee a replay of every bullshit trumped up scandal of the Bill Clinton administration, would guarantee we would see lots of us real Liberals who are sick to death of the same old do Nothing Democrats defect to third parties, or even God help us, Ron Paul who despite having a few policy positions that are enormously appealing to me– ending the War On Iraq and ending the War On Drugs, is basically running on a platform of dismantling the social safety net that Democratic Party spent its entire history building up and is thus Not gonna get my support in November.

And having so laboriously gotten to having this point made, I waited in vane for anyone to pick up and run with it. And I thought to myself if we can’t get Democrats to realize what a disaster Hillary is going to be, maybe I should just bag it and move to Canada where they’ve already won all the things we Liberals have to fight for here. This discussion was not one of our better ones,
like the one on Health Care Reform

So it was timely that I happened on Friday to scan a copy of WAIT! Don’t Move To Canada! a strategy guide for despairing liberals to buck up, reclaim the word and the principles and reform the country by speaking out, blogging, writing letters and not giving up. And I shrugged and said to myself ‘but I already do all of those things’. This one comes mildly recommended if you feel you need a book to tell you to write letters to the editor, get involved in the blogosphere, and speak your mind. Which may be the weakest recommendation I’ve ever given a book.

A final note, all across the Blogosphere on October 15th, that’s one week from today, bloggers will unite to speak out on enviornmental issues. If you blog, please consider planning an environmental topic or theme for next Monday. More info here.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
5 Responses to “On Blog Catalog All (Political) Roads Lead To Canada”
  1. techfun UNITED STATES says:

    The fact that someone sees the need for a book like Wait! Don’t Move to Canada: A Stay-And-Fight Strategy to Win Back America says a lot about the apathy that permeates our society. It’s important to note that the apathy is not uniformly spread throughout our culture and society.

    There is no shortage of letters to fill the editorial pages of our newspapers. Many places have to limit the length of citizens are allowed to spend addressing city councils. If you want your views to be heard you need to take action. It’s not enough to sit back and wait for the “political types” who share your views to do the heavy lifting.

  2. Micah Tillman UNITED STATES says:

    I don’t know about my fellow party members (that sounds so Communist. What I mean is that I’m speaking from across the aisle, even though I’m not sure people on my side of the aisle actually agree with anything I think), but I think the Democrats would be safest with Obama.

    But maybe that’s just me.

  3. Alan UNITED STATES says:

    You may be right about Obama, I think it’s too early to really day about that. But I am positive Hillary is the Democrat’s best opportunity to lose again.

  4. Jennyjinx UNITED STATES says:

    You’re absolutely right. If Clinton gets the nod (and it’s looking like everything’s getting lined up just for that) the Dems don’t stand a chance.

    I do believe that many Dems will hold their noses and vote for her anyway (don’t want to “throw away” that vote), but the independents and fence-sitters aren’t going to have it. The only way she could possibly stand a chance is if the Republicans had a candidate that is anything like Bush. They’ve got a lot of, well, war mongering fools (for lack of a better term) on their ticket, but the challenger would have to be really OUT there for Clinton to stand a chance.

    If she gets on the ticket, I’m afraid at least 4 more years of exactly what we’re getting.

    Came via BC, by the way. Great topic.

  5. Mouseclone UNITED STATES says:

    I’m not allied or claim to be with any party. I am more for what will help everyone as a whole even if it doesn’t help me right now, it could help my children and grand children.

    there will always be someone with more time and resources than I have to toss at a problem. time and resources is related to the number of people working for a company or person and the dollar amount fixed to that time.

    Some of the problems I see with some of the people that get caught up in lobbing for things is that they get very narrow minded. Their focus is on one thing, and they forget bout the rest of the world and the impact that it could have on it.

    Based on the comments about Obama, he will not even wear a flag pin, it is clear that you would believe what ever he says. HE WILL NOT WEAR THE COUNTRIES FLAG! does that not sound bad to people. He is not even proud of the country that he was born in. That sends a clear message to me that he doesn’t even deserve the notion of being our president.

    Scratch that. I just did a little more reading up on the pin thing that I heard about the day it happened, bad me for not following up on that, but it would appear that he would rather show though actions than though symbolism. That i can stand up and applaud for.

    I’m going to shutup now before I make a bigger fool of myself.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Close
E-mail It